
Four steps that sort a full desk, and what to hand off without handing off the judgment.

An adjuster caseload leaves a few minutes per file, and the clock on each file keeps running. This post shows a four-step method for deciding which files get the time.
An adjuster caseload does not grow evenly. New files arrive every day. Old files do not close on a matching schedule. The desk fills faster than it empties.
The hours in a week stay fixed. Each added file takes minutes from every other file. So the useful question is not how to work harder. It is which files get the minutes.
Regulators set response clocks. The NAIC model claims regulation says an insurer must acknowledge notice of a claim within 15 days, unless it pays first. It also sets 15 days to reply to other claimant communications that expect an answer. The model counts calendar days (NAIC Model Regulation 902). Each state adopts its own version, so check yours.
Every new file starts clocks like these. They run whether or not anyone has read the file.
No public benchmark gives the right number of files per adjuster. One older estimate shows the scale. A 2012 Business Insurance column quoted a broker's estimate. A California workers' compensation adjuster with about 150 indemnity files spends 12 to 18 minutes per file per month (Business Insurance).
That is one person's estimate, for one state and one line, from 2012. Treat it as an illustration of scale, not a standard. Bodily injury desks differ.
Phones, email and attorney letters break up the hours that remain. In a 2006 Gallup interview, UC Irvine researcher Gloria Mark reported that interrupted work took on average 23 minutes and 15 seconds to pick back up (Gallup Business Journal). That covers work resumed the same day. It includes time spent on the interruption and on other tasks first. It comes from general workplace research, not from claims staff.
It still points the same way. A day cut into pieces rarely leaves room for one long read of one file.
The aim is simple: spend the scarce minutes where a file can still change. A routine file does not need the same time as a litigated file. The method has four steps.
Put each open file in one of three piles.
A file count says nothing about which files are urgent. The tier does.
SAIF, a workers' compensation insurer, does this at program level. It describes a complexity model applied to every new claim at set-up. It also describes a severity model that identifies the top 30% of disabling claims early and prescribes activities for them (SAIF). One adjuster cannot build a model. A three-pile sort on Monday morning does a smaller version of the same job.
Attorney involvement is a strong Tier A signal. The Insurance Research Council studied more than 7.4 million auto injury claims closed with payment between mid-2017 and mid-2022. Litigation rates nearly doubled over that period, from 10% to 18% of claimants. Represented bodily injury claimants waited a median of nearly 440 days for closure, more than double the time for unrepresented claimants (Insurance Research Council).
Represented claims stay open much longer, so they hold a place on the desk for longer. Plan for that on the day the letter arrives.
Tiers are not permanent. A file moves up when new facts arrive. Write the triggers down once, so the decision takes seconds:
Move the file up the same day. Move it down when the clock clears. Once a week, scan only the files with new activity. A tier change is one line, not a file read.
Reading is often the first work a broken day removes. So schedule it. Book two blocks a week of uninterrupted time for Tier A and Tier B files. Batch calls and routine email into set windows outside those blocks.
Here is an illustration of the budget. Assume 150 files and 15 minutes per file per month, the midpoint of the 2012 estimate. That estimate comes from California workers' compensation, not a bodily injury desk. The total is 37.5 hours a month. Spread flat, every file gets 15 minutes. Tiered, the same hours go to different files.
Illustrative only. All tier counts and minutes below are assumptions.
The tier counts and minutes are assumptions, not a benchmark. The point is the shift. Tier A files get four times the flat share. Tier C files get a third.
Five minutes is only safe for a file that is truly routine. That is why Step 2 matters.
End every touch with one line: the next action, its due date and why. For example: "Request updated MRI report; due 14 Nov; treatment gap since August."
When the file returns to the top of the desk, you start from the note, not from page one. Finding your place again is lost time. The note also carries over if the file moves to another adjuster.
Tier B files wait because the reading is slow. Much of that time is volume work: categorizing pages, removing duplicates and putting records in date order. Tools can take that part. amaise describes its bodily injury AI for claim file review as handling record categorization, summary extraction and ICD-10 coding across the documents in a file. The adjuster still reads the findings and makes the call.
Staffing decisions need numbers. Tier counts show the real load: how many files need action now, and how many have never been read end to end.
"I have 150 files" starts an argument. Try instead: "Fifteen files are Tier A, and 45 Tier B files have not been read end to end." That starts a conversation about rebalancing. SAIF routes claims by complexity rating for the same reason.
Triage moves minutes. It does not create them. A desk with too many Tier A files still fails.
The method also depends on honest sorting. A file wrongly placed in Tier C can hide a problem for months. Response deadlines apply to every tier, so they come first.
Treat the method as a working habit and test it on your own desk. After one quarter, count how many files moved up a tier late. That count shows where your sorting needs work.
Choose which cookies and similar technologies we may use. You can change your choice at any time. Details are in our Cookie Notice.